ERP i-Botics – Exoskeletons

Innovation in exoskeletons to support workers

Background

Various passive exoskeletons, for e.g., trunk or arm/shoulder support, exist. Some are close-to market-application products: lightweight and relatively easy to use. However, their effectiveness has been proven only for static work postures and their adaptability to multiple tasks is minimal. Active exoskeletons are potentially more adaptive, thus making them more attractive for industry. The development of exosuits is further away from industrial application. TNO plays a role in the development and evaluation of various passive and active exoskeletons (e.g., XOback – IIT, Exobuddy, Skelex, Laevo, and Spexor). TNO brings well recognized expertise on human-exoskeleton interaction, i.e., biomechanics, anatomical fit, sensing (human intention) and control, comfort and acceptance, and industrial implementation.

Objective

To develop the knowledge and technology for a wearable robot (active exoskeleton) to provide mechanical support to workers involved in physically heavy, mobile, and ‘difficult-to-automate’ situations. Secondly, to show the human body impact of exoskeleton use in heavy work. Thirdly, to help companies answer the question whether an exoskeleton is a potential solution for them and which exoskeleton is best suited for the job.

Approach

Within this project, our primary focus is on the sensing and control of a wearable robot. Experiments will provide data on control algorithms, sets of input variables, calibration methods, and human body impact. Based on the outcomes, a demonstrator will be realized. To help companies answer the question whether an exoskeleton is a potential solution for them, we developed a tool in the form of a questionnaire as well as a sensor based tool that extracts the movement characteristics that are a relevant indicator for the potential of exoskeleton implementation.

Project partners

dr. Aijse de Vries

Related publications:

Selecting the appropriate input variables in a regression approach to estimate actively generated muscle moments around L5/S1 for exoskeleton control. J. Biomechanics.
A Tabasi, I Kingma, MP de Looze, AS Koopman, W van Dijk, JH van Dieën
Type of publication: Scientific publications
Publication date: 2020
Video-demo: Sensing, control and human body impact of industrial exoskeletons
Aijse de Vries
Type of publication: Press-related
Publication date: September, 2019
The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting. J. Biomechanics 91, 14-22.
AS Koopman, S Toxiri, V Power, I Kingma, JH van Dieën, J Ortiz, MP de Looze
Type of publication: Scientific publications
Publication date: 2019
Rationale, implementation, and evaluation of assistive strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton. Frontiers in Robotics and Artifical Intelligence.
S Toxiri, AS Koopman, M Lazzaroni, J Ortiz, MP de Looze
Type of publication: Scientific publications
Publication date: 2018

Related news and insights

1 jaar ago

Team i-Botics: 5th place in the ANA Avatar XPRIZE
After two intense weeks, i-Botics finished in fifth place in the…

1 jaar ago

Day 12 – ANA Avatar XPRIZE – The last goodbye
This was the last day of our ANA Avatar XPRIZE adventure….

1 jaar ago

Day 11 – ANA Avatar XPRIZE – Day 2 of the finals
So much happening in the last four years. So many exciting,…